Results from selection experiments

After I fixed my Bug I had rerun the experiments for the selection strategies.
It is obvious that I would need more runs per experiments to get rid of the bias, but I think the results are still reasonable.
The pictures from my “last” posts are updated(corrected) and here are the averages of the final picks.

Sinus:

Name reward splits samples
greedyTuctF 0.6200948656572903 64.12 1000.0
greedyFuctF 0.6023553929980933 64.079 1000.0
greedyFuctT 0.6036651458279564 70.646 1000.0
greedyTuctT 0.6267016743750767 70.642 1000.0

Sixhumpcamelback

Name reward splits samples
greedyTuctF 1.0295803509510142 121.688 1000.0
greedyFuctF 1.029588522858646 121.819 1000.0
greedyFuctT 1.028956652335863 121.647 1000.0
greedyTuctT 1.0289708657884484 121.736 1000.0

DonutWorld:

Name reward splits samples
greedyTuctF 0.9976101741153903 216.749 1000.0
greedyFuctF 0.9975777801603039 216.864 1000.0
greedyFuctT 0.9981728203167863 212.326 1000.0
greedyTuctT 0.9981697167821809 212.416 1000.0
Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s